Skip to main content

The Carbon Footprint in the Logistics Chain

The news called it a historic agreement, when U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping announced in a historic climate change deal, that both countries would curb their greenhouse gas emissions over the next two decades.
The agreement will give confidence to both companies and investors to support clean energy investment and technological innovation that will ensure the necessary capacity to meet or exceed the stated targets.

The idea and the objective is not new, but the agreement sends a powerful signal to the business community, which is pushing more forcefully for coordinated policies and clear market signals to deal with climate change.

For example: Nike’s environmental goal for logistics and transportation is to achieve a 30% reduction in carbon emissions by 2020. This is a pretty aggressive goal taking into account a growing business.

The US-China agreement may supports Nike’s (and other companies’) strategic decision and hopefully encourages many other companies to follow.

Raw materials and production processes are usually the main drivers for the carbon footprint – but the logistics chain with over 10% is also one of the main contributors.

As the mode of transport (e.g. vessel, train, truck) is not under direct control of the shipper, the shipper is
  • either depending on all its logistics chain partners to consistently provide data, or
  •  monitoring the shipments itself with an independent monitoring solution

in order to track, report and ultimately reduce the logistics emissions.

Real-time cargo monitoring could provide the relevant information, help to select areas of improvement and monitor the improvement year after year.

Improvements in the logistics chain are not only good for the environment. Less emissions usually also translate to less logistics cost, less capital cost, less insurance, etc.

To quote Nike again: Just do it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Networked Supply Chains Require Better Visibility

As manufactures and retailers increasingly depend on extended rosters of sourcing companies, the resulting networked supply chain requires improved visibility. Importers are using multiple sourcing vendors to improve their ability to respond to market demand and opportunities. With this increased sourcing agility comes the increased risk of delivery failure due to a supply chain disruption and, concurrently, the increased importance of visibility into each step of the supply chain. The ability to in real time identify the location and status of the sourced goods gives the importer the ability to fine tune its distribution channels, its inventory management and its ability to fulfill commitments to its end users. The ability to real time monitor the status of goods requires a combination of container based technology, back-end business applications and an extended network of logistics fulfillment partners. In response to this emerging demand, many companies are offering RFID, GSM and si...

arviem and KeyTone unveil strategic partnership

KeyTone and arviem unveil strategic partnership to deliver trade monitoring and management services for global supply chain visibility Cupertino, CA, February 09, 2011: KeyTone Technologies, a recognized leader in RFID and other sensor-based solutions, announced today its strategic partnership with arviem to deliver ”in-transit” trade monitoring and management services to Fortune 1000 companies around the globe. The partnership has resulted in deploying a managed service offering targeted at companies engaged in global trade transactions worldwide. This service offering is now supported by the release of a new comprehensive software platform to enable easy web based monitoring, analytics and reporting. Managing logistics operations for a global supply chain is challenging. The ability to track, trace, monitor and respond to events throughout the transit of goods would ma...

Embracing Chaos: The Key to Antifragile Global Supply Chains

  Introduction In the intricate dance of our global economy, supply chains serve as the connective tissue between producers and consumers. Yet, these sprawling networks are far from simple. In an unexpected twist, injecting a dose of controlled chaos into supply chains can enhance its efficiency. Resilience vs. Antifragility: A Paradigm Shift Resilience is the ability to rebound from adversity. On the other hand, antifragility is a concept that transcends mere survival; it's about thriving in the face of chaos, learning, and evolving through experience. In simpler terms, resilience is about weathering storms, while antifragility is about harnessing those storms to become more robust and adaptable. It's the ability to survive unpredictability and flourish because of it. Crafting an Antifragile Supply Chain So, how do you make a supply chain antifragile? The answer is deceptively straightforward: introduce calculated chaos. Deliberately subjecting the supply chain to controlled s...