Skip to main content

The challenge of schedule reliability in international supply chains

According to JOC.com, SeaIntel Maritime Analysis recently reported, that the trans-Atlantic vessel reliability hit a three-year low.
“Only 42 percent of ships in the trade arrived within one day of their scheduled calls.”
This figure represents the performance on the trans-Atlantic service level for April 2015 only.
Based on the shipments monitored over the last twelve months, arviem’s performance analysis concludes on a similar figure. The percentage of vessels, which have arrived within one day of their scheduled calls, is at 60 percent (shipments monitored globally and not only trans-Atlantic shipments).

If the most capital-intensive service providers in logistics can’t sail in time, it is probably safe to say, that the other service providers are even worse, which has ripple effects on the end-to-end supply chain schedule reliability.

arviem’s analysis show, that only 37 percent of all shipments arrived “on time” (delay of 1 day or less). That means, that 63 percent of all door-to-door shipments showed a major delay, which in average sums up to 5 days.



This is one of the reasons, why arviem’s clients show more and more interest in the performance analysis of their shipments on different routes and in getting better results for the estimated time of arrival of their shipments. The ETA, which has become increasingly important for planning tight international supply chains, depends to a bigger part on the vessel-schedule and door-to-door reliability.

Some financial figures show, that schedule reliability is a factor not to be sneezed at:
·      For trade financing one of the milestones in the payment schedule is the arrival of the container in the port of discharge. The opportunity-cost for not getting the financing on time is at around 8 US$ for every day of delay.
·      The earlier the cargo gets to the client, the earlier the invoice can be sent and the earlier the cash is in. Every day the cash comes in later is an opportunity cost of 15 US$ per day of delay.
·      Cargo in transit needs to be financed, meaning it generates capital cost. Every day of delay is an additional 10 US$ bill virtually taken out of the CFO’s pocket.

Thanks to real-time cargo and supply-chain monitoring, such delays could be proactively addressed and managed. Each of the above example shows, that savings of 50 US$ and more per shipment could be achieved. Let alone the savings on product integrity, insurance, administrative activities, and many more.

What about your experience in schedule reliability?
Can you support the average delay of 5 days on a door-to-door shipment?

What actions do you take to prevent delays on your shipments?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Networked Supply Chains Require Better Visibility

As manufactures and retailers increasingly depend on extended rosters of sourcing companies, the resulting networked supply chain requires improved visibility. Importers are using multiple sourcing vendors to improve their ability to respond to market demand and opportunities. With this increased sourcing agility comes the increased risk of delivery failure due to a supply chain disruption and, concurrently, the increased importance of visibility into each step of the supply chain. The ability to in real time identify the location and status of the sourced goods gives the importer the ability to fine tune its distribution channels, its inventory management and its ability to fulfill commitments to its end users. The ability to real time monitor the status of goods requires a combination of container based technology, back-end business applications and an extended network of logistics fulfillment partners. In response to this emerging demand, many companies are offering RFID, GSM and si...
3 comments
Read more

Embracing Chaos: The Key to Antifragile Global Supply Chains

  Introduction In the intricate dance of our global economy, supply chains serve as the connective tissue between producers and consumers. Yet, these sprawling networks are far from simple. In an unexpected twist, injecting a dose of controlled chaos into supply chains can enhance its efficiency. Resilience vs. Antifragility: A Paradigm Shift Resilience is the ability to rebound from adversity. On the other hand, antifragility is a concept that transcends mere survival; it's about thriving in the face of chaos, learning, and evolving through experience. In simpler terms, resilience is about weathering storms, while antifragility is about harnessing those storms to become more robust and adaptable. It's the ability to survive unpredictability and flourish because of it. Crafting an Antifragile Supply Chain So, how do you make a supply chain antifragile? The answer is deceptively straightforward: introduce calculated chaos. Deliberately subjecting the supply chain to controlled s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Supply Chain Digitalization: Enhancing Efficiency, Reducing Costs, and Boosting Margins

  Introduction Supply chain digitalization is a pivotal element of modern supply chain management, driving improvements in inventory management, operational efficiency, and asset utilization. This article delves into how supply chain digitalization accomplishes these objectives and the broader benefits it brings to businesses. Improving Inventory Management Supply chain digitalization plays a crucial role in elevating inventory management. It achieves this through: Enhanced Inventory Accuracy: By using and leveraging real-time data and advanced tracking systems, supply chain digitalization minimizes discrepancies and inaccuracies in inventory records, ensuring a more precise account of stock levels. Reduced Inventory Costs: By optimizing demand forecasting and streamlining procurement processes, digitalization minimizes the need for excessive safety stock, thus cutting inventory carrying costs. Improved Inventory Turnover: Rapid access to accurate inventory data allows for better...
Post a Comment
Read more