Skip to main content

100% container scanning is not reasonable

In a JOC.com article from last week a US congresswoman is quoted as following: “I have said it once and I will say it again, we need 100 percent scanning at our ports. The risks are too high not to.”

I’d like to use an analogy in the discussion about 100% container scanning.
Imagine you have your house inspected by the police to make sure no thief is in the house who could harm you or steal your valuable goods. After successful inspection, the police move away and your house remains unguarded and unlocked.
There is a short moment the house can be considered secure and trusted. But shortly after, the house is wide open again for any gatecrasher.
Even worse. Because of the inspection, you feel secure and you lose any usual caution, which could lead to the situation of being negatively surprised easily.

The discussion about the 100% container scanning is comparable with the house inspection.
For a short moment the container might be marked as secure, if the scanning data can be interpreted correctly. Already shortly after, however, the container is again open to hostile manipulation without any protection. And because the container is marked as secure by a Governmental Agency, nobody will doubt any moment, that this specific container is secure.
We all know, that the intrusion into a container from any side is an easy job for a trained person. And therefore – trusting a container, which is marked secure but remains unmonitored, is naïve and dangerous.

In my opinion, it is more reasonable to inspect a container at the point of loading (as most C-TPAT Tier III companies are doing anyway). After inspection and loading, the container should be monitored by a solution/service like the arviem real-time cargo monitoring service. It allows to detect any intrusion in real-time. It also allows detecting deviations from the route and/or shipment plan. And the events or alerts can be sent immediately to the responsible authorities in order to take immediate actions.

Such a procedure would be more effective and efficient and would also be supported by the shippers, as they have a commercial benefit from real-time monitoring as well.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Networked Supply Chains Require Better Visibility

As manufactures and retailers increasingly depend on extended rosters of sourcing companies, the resulting networked supply chain requires improved visibility. Importers are using multiple sourcing vendors to improve their ability to respond to market demand and opportunities. With this increased sourcing agility comes the increased risk of delivery failure due to a supply chain disruption and, concurrently, the increased importance of visibility into each step of the supply chain. The ability to in real time identify the location and status of the sourced goods gives the importer the ability to fine tune its distribution channels, its inventory management and its ability to fulfill commitments to its end users. The ability to real time monitor the status of goods requires a combination of container based technology, back-end business applications and an extended network of logistics fulfillment partners. In response to this emerging demand, many companies are offering RFID, GSM and si...
3 comments
Read more

arviem and KeyTone unveil strategic partnership

KeyTone and arviem unveil strategic partnership to deliver trade monitoring and management services for global supply chain visibility Cupertino, CA, February 09, 2011: KeyTone Technologies, a recognized leader in RFID and other sensor-based solutions, announced today its strategic partnership with arviem to deliver ”in-transit” trade monitoring and management services to Fortune 1000 companies around the globe. The partnership has resulted in deploying a managed service offering targeted at companies engaged in global trade transactions worldwide. This service offering is now supported by the release of a new comprehensive software platform to enable easy web based monitoring, analytics and reporting. Managing logistics operations for a global supply chain is challenging. The ability to track, trace, monitor and respond to events throughout the transit of goods would ma...
2 comments
Read more

Embracing Chaos: The Key to Antifragile Global Supply Chains

  Introduction In the intricate dance of our global economy, supply chains serve as the connective tissue between producers and consumers. Yet, these sprawling networks are far from simple. In an unexpected twist, injecting a dose of controlled chaos into supply chains can enhance its efficiency. Resilience vs. Antifragility: A Paradigm Shift Resilience is the ability to rebound from adversity. On the other hand, antifragility is a concept that transcends mere survival; it's about thriving in the face of chaos, learning, and evolving through experience. In simpler terms, resilience is about weathering storms, while antifragility is about harnessing those storms to become more robust and adaptable. It's the ability to survive unpredictability and flourish because of it. Crafting an Antifragile Supply Chain So, how do you make a supply chain antifragile? The answer is deceptively straightforward: introduce calculated chaos. Deliberately subjecting the supply chain to controlled s...
Post a Comment
Read more