Skip to main content

100% container scanning is not reasonable

In a JOC.com article from last week a US congresswoman is quoted as following: “I have said it once and I will say it again, we need 100 percent scanning at our ports. The risks are too high not to.”

I’d like to use an analogy in the discussion about 100% container scanning.
Imagine you have your house inspected by the police to make sure no thief is in the house who could harm you or steal your valuable goods. After successful inspection, the police move away and your house remains unguarded and unlocked.
There is a short moment the house can be considered secure and trusted. But shortly after, the house is wide open again for any gatecrasher.
Even worse. Because of the inspection, you feel secure and you lose any usual caution, which could lead to the situation of being negatively surprised easily.

The discussion about the 100% container scanning is comparable with the house inspection.
For a short moment the container might be marked as secure, if the scanning data can be interpreted correctly. Already shortly after, however, the container is again open to hostile manipulation without any protection. And because the container is marked as secure by a Governmental Agency, nobody will doubt any moment, that this specific container is secure.
We all know, that the intrusion into a container from any side is an easy job for a trained person. And therefore – trusting a container, which is marked secure but remains unmonitored, is naïve and dangerous.

In my opinion, it is more reasonable to inspect a container at the point of loading (as most C-TPAT Tier III companies are doing anyway). After inspection and loading, the container should be monitored by a solution/service like the arviem real-time cargo monitoring service. It allows to detect any intrusion in real-time. It also allows detecting deviations from the route and/or shipment plan. And the events or alerts can be sent immediately to the responsible authorities in order to take immediate actions.

Such a procedure would be more effective and efficient and would also be supported by the shippers, as they have a commercial benefit from real-time monitoring as well.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Networked Supply Chains Require Better Visibility

As manufactures and retailers increasingly depend on extended rosters of sourcing companies, the resulting networked supply chain requires improved visibility. Importers are using multiple sourcing vendors to improve their ability to respond to market demand and opportunities. With this increased sourcing agility comes the increased risk of delivery failure due to a supply chain disruption and, concurrently, the increased importance of visibility into each step of the supply chain. The ability to in real time identify the location and status of the sourced goods gives the importer the ability to fine tune its distribution channels, its inventory management and its ability to fulfill commitments to its end users. The ability to real time monitor the status of goods requires a combination of container based technology, back-end business applications and an extended network of logistics fulfillment partners. In response to this emerging demand, many companies are offering RFID, GSM and si
3 comments
Read more

Traceability: Meet your food before your first bite!

  Traceability is a digital solution that enables companies to effectively track their products from origin to consumer by utilizing digital markers for identification. Various traceability solutions exist, including Digital Traceability, Laboratory Traceability, and Mapping Traceability. With the growth of the market for high-quality food products, the importance of traceability and origin verification has increased significantly. These measures are crucial in protecting brands and ensuring ongoing consumer satisfaction. 58% of consumers are willing to pay a premium if it supports local farmers. In food production, consumers have a strong desire to have complete visibility into their food's origin and production methods. Research conducted by Label Insight revealed that 81% of consumers actively seek more information about where their food is grown or raised before purchasing. Moreover, 58% are willing to pay a premium if it supports local farmers, while 57% will only buy items ce
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the Impediments to an Effective Global Trade?

If you define an ‘Effective Global Trade’ as a trade that is executed on schedule, without damage to the cargo and at planned cost, then your threshold for an ‘Effective Global Trade’ is too low. If you define an ‘Effective Global Trade’ as a transaction that is on schedule, at cost, end to end visible, continuously monitored, agile enough to enable redirecting the container and inventory while in transit, with managed and authorized custody, all transactions executed on line, 100% compliant with Customs and regulatory rules, and with fulfillment data integrated into your supply chain management system and ERP’s, then your concept of an ‘Effective Global Trade’ is aspirational. What challenges do Consignees or traders, LSP’s and Regulators face in trying to realize an aspirational “Effective Global Trade’? Consignee, LSP’s and Regulators: the consignee, fulfillment and regulatory takeholders business practices and culture attributes that impede an effective trade include: · Cons
2 comments
Read more